Deeply rooted in the Bible, natural law theory often influences actual legal affairs involving religion. An example can be found in Burwell v. Hobby Lobby Stores in 2014, where the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that for-profit companies are not required by law to provide health insurance to employees that covers the cost of services that violate their religious beliefs. Man is not taught natural law per se, but we “discover” it by constantly making decisions for good rather than evil. Some schools of thought believe that natural law is transmitted to man by a divine presence. Natural law theory is based on the idea that natural laws are universal concepts and not based on culture or customs. Yet it is a way society acts naturally and naturally as human beings. It is important to emphasize that natural law should not be confused with positive law, as it does not involve judicial decisions or legislative decrees.
Natural law emphasizes human behavior that involves ethical norms and inherent species. In the 16th century, the Salamanca School (Francisco Suárez, Francisco de Vitoria, etc.) developed a philosophy of natural law. Despite the pagan origins of natural law theory, some (but not all) of the early Church Fathers attempted to integrate it into Christianity, especially in the West. Augustine of Hippo equated natural law with the condition of man before the fall; The implication was that after the fall, life according to nature was no longer possible and people had to seek salvation through divine law and grace instead. In the twelfth century, the lawyer Canon Gratian reversed this trend and assimilated natural law and divine law. Thomas Aquinas restored the concept of natural law as something independent, asserting that natural law, as the perfection of human reason, could approach eternal law but could not be fully understood and had to be supplemented by divine law. Now, to say that human laws that contradict divine law are not binding, that is, are not laws, is complete nonsense. The most harmful laws, and therefore the most contrary to God`s will, have been and are constantly enforced as laws of the courts. Let us suppose that a harmless or positively beneficial act is forbidden by the sovereign on pain of death; if I commit this act, I will be tried and condemned, and if I protest against the verdict that it violates the law of God, which has commanded that human legislators do not forbid acts that have no harmful consequences, the Tribunal will demonstrate the indecisiveness of my reasoning by hanging me, in accordance with the law, whose validity I have challenged (Austin, 1995, p. 158). Already in the thirteenth century it was said that “the natural law .. is the basis of all laws” and of the clerk and judges that “natural law requires that every man be present before he can be punished; and if he is absent by reservation, he must be summoned to appear and in default.
  Moreover, we note in 1824 that “the proceedings before our courts are based on the law of England, and that law is again founded on the law of nature and the revealed law of God. German.  British polemicist Thomas Gordon “incorporated Cicero into the radical ideological tradition that traveled from the mother country to the colonies during the eighteenth century and decisively shaped early American political culture.”  Cicero`s description of immutable, eternal, and universal natural law was quoted by Burlamaqui and later by the American revolutionary jurist James Wilson.  Cicero became John Adams` “principal model of public service, republican virtue, and forensic eloquence.”  Adams wrote of Cicero: “Since all the ages of the world have not produced a greater statesman and philosopher united in the same character, his authority should carry great weight.”  Thomas Jefferson “first met Cicero as a schoolboy, learning Latin, and read his letters and speeches throughout his life.